Category Archives: Literacy teacher educators

Thoughts on being a student of teaching

March 28, 2017a teacher's journey, academics, AERA, Literacy teacher educators, longitudinal research, study of teachers, Teacher educationycleovoulou

As I (Yiola) prepare for the upcoming AERA conference by finalizing and editing my papers I am drawn to a few key ideas on teacher development that I have come across in the literature.

The International Handbook of Teacher Education volumes 1 and 2 (Loughran and Hamilton Eds., 2016) include a number of chapters on topics in teacher education. Our own team leaders Clare Kosnik and Clive Beck along with close colleague Lin Goodwin (Teachers College, Columbia University) share a chapter on Reform Efforts in Teacher Education.

9789811003677

The volumes are filled with interesting chapters. What has caught my attention at this time is a chapter on teacher led professional development. Bullough and Smith write on Being a student of teaching: Practitioner research and study groups. The chapter describes the idea of being a student of teaching (as a current practitioner) from two dimensions: the personal and the contextual. Exploring reflective practice (the personal dimension) and opportunities and support for teacher learning (the contextual dimension), the authors share insights from Dewey (1933) to Avalos (2004, 2011) and Livingston (2011). The chapter also explores ways of being a student of teaching: through practitioner research and study groups and the varied ways one can learn. An in-depth and detailed review and analysis of teacher led professional development.

This work fits beautifully with my paper titled: Examining the Professional Life of an Elementary School Teacher: Literacy Education in the Making where I have taken one participant from our 13 year longitudinal study of 40 elementary schools teachers from Canada and the USA and shared her literacy teaching trajectory (mainly from the contextual dimension). I am looking forward to sharing this paper and work at the upcoming AERA conference in late April.

Literacy/English Teacher Educators — Goals for Their Courses

March 20, 2017communication, education, higher education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher education, teacher educators, Uncategorizedgoals for literacy courses, higher education, knowledge of literacy, literacy education, literacy teacher educators, teacher education, what do student teachers need to know for literacyckosnik

Along with my research team we have been studying literacy/English teacher educators. Through this work I became very fascinated with a notion of a pedagogy of literacy teacher education. In the second interview we asked them to define the goals for their courses. We then categorized and tabulated the results. As the table below show not surprisingly building knowledge of literacy was their first goal.

Goals for course	Number who identified this goal
Build knowledge of literacy	28
Build knowledge of pedagogical strategies	25
Student teachers adopt a professional role	18
Student teachers develop a critical stance	16
Build knowledge of government initiatives	13
Build knowledge of digital technology	11
Focus on student teacher growth	10

When the specific goals for their courses were analyzed using NVivo a more nuanced picture emerged. Their vision for literacy varied tremendously. Regarding literacy although learning about literacy and acquiring pedagogical strategies were common goals, interpretations of what student teachers need to know about literacy theory and teaching strategies varied.

Some like Melissa, Dominique, and Maya (pseudonyms used throughout) focused on critical literacy while Amelia and Jessie had multiliteracies as the framework for their courses. Jane and Lance focused on children’s literature, while Sharon and Margie had the writing process as their priority. One LTE focused her course totally on phonics and phonological awareness. Justin commented: “I see our work as being about the development of teachers as public intellectuals … not simply to prepare beginning teachers for whatever the particular curricular or pedagogic demands of policy here now are but for a lifetime in teaching and this involves them being able to be both critical of initiatives that are thrust on them and creative in their approaches.”

It also became apparent the teacher educators’ broader goals for teacher education were quite different. For example Justin believed that he should “prepare student teachers for a lifetime of teaching; prepare them to be public intellectuals; see schools as an emancipatory space. Caterina aims to have her student teachers “themselves as professionals not college students.” Emma has very specific goals: “understand current curriculum … develop skills to plan and asses … be independent thinkers who are not just teaching for the schools we have.” Bob by contrast has broader goals “student teachers learn to focus on the students … to unpack their beliefs [about schooling] … and to develop an identity as a professional.” While Martha Ann focuses on the individual’s development “develop a sense of self-efficacy … learn to take initiative … …. know children’s literature … empower students.” The lack of consistency in literacy methods courses (content and pedagogy) in teacher education is a concern because student teachers may graduate with markedly different understandings of literacy and may have been exposed to a particular set of literacy theories and pedagogies.

In my next blog post I will present the framework for a pedagogy of literacy teacher education.

Mobile Learning

September 23, 2016classroom teachers, education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher education, teacher educatorscell phone brands, cell phones in the classroom, learning curves, mobile phones, polling on cell phones, tech through cell phonesDr. Cathy Miyata

Well, I (Cathy) changed mobile phone brands. I was an avid iphone user, but my son-in-law convinced me to switch to an android. I’m delighted to say the switch over has been pretty smooth. In truth, I see very little difference. Both use apps. Both are user friendly. Both take great pictures. My messaging and contacts all remained the same. Mind you, I couldn’t answer my phone the first time it rang because I kept tapping the icon when I should have been sliding, and I didn’t set the alarm correctly the first time it used it and slept in. But other than that, the learning curve has been quite minimal. My favourite function of my new android is the slide pattern security code. So much easier than tapping numbers. Interestingly, I showed my new phone to an old friend the other day and she was horrified by the idea of not only switching phones, she wont give up her flip top. She said the new phones overwhelm her. I’m relieved I have not been overwhelmed, in fact I am invigorated. I’d like to try to use mobile phones more in my literacy class. Yesterday, I discovered our university does not have a class set of clickers for class feedback. But on Google I discovered I can use an app called Poll Everywhere for free with my class.

www.polleverywhere.com

The video assures me any mobile phone will work, even flip phones! Next week, its use your cell phone in class day. Just hope I set the alarm correctly and don’t sleep in!

High Defnition

Good luck these first few weeks!

September 9, 2016academics, classroom teachers, education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher education, teacher educatorsstart of the school year, teacher anxiety, transitionsDr. Cathy Miyata

A number of my friends and colleagues experienced the scenarios depicted below. Luckily, I (Cathy) never did. The transitions were smooth for us as parents and for our children. As teachers, however, my husband and I would get anxious, whether teaching K or undergraduates: what will our students be like?; am I ready?; how will I get my classroom set up?; I don’t understand this new policy… Parents I spoke to (that were not teachers) were surprised by this. They assumed we had it ‘down pat’ and never even thought about it. They didn’t understand that every year was a brand new set of challenges and joys and it would take a few weeks to get things settled in.

I wish all the teachers out there, elementary, secondary, and higher education a great start to their year. May it be as smooth and fruitful!

All the best,

Cathy

Defining Literacy

September 2, 2016academics, classroom teachers, curriculum; teachers, education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher education, teacher educatorsdefinition of literacy, learning about literacy, literacy, teacher candidates, teacher educationDr. Cathy Miyata

One of my (Cathy’s) favourite first tasks for my new teacher candidates is to have them define the term literacy on paper- written or drawn- no right or wrong. I tuck this away for them and then give it back on the last day of our literacy course so they can it to compare their (hopefully somewhat) altered definition. For some the definition changes a lot and for some not so much. The differences represent the teacher candidates prior knowledge of literacy and literacy practices; their ability to make adjustments; their open mindedness; and their ability to accept change. Reshaping ones definition of literacy is a process and its actually quite demanding.

Every year I look for new academic, scholarly, or institutional definitions of literacy, or as I prefer to refer to it- literacies- to share with my TC’s as their definitions shift and grow. This year I will include the definition below. It is from the Ontario government’s document Focus on Literacy (2013):

LITERACY – Kindergarten to Grade 12 Literacy is … the ability to use language and images in rich and varied forms to read, write, listen, speak, view, represent, discuss and think critically about ideas. Literacy enables us to share information and to interact with others. Literacy is an essential tool for personal growth and active participation in a democratic society.

Literacy involves the capacity to:

• access, manage, create and evaluate information

• think imaginatively and analytically

• communicate thoughts and ideas effectively

• apply metacognitive knowledge and skills

• develop a sense of self-efficacy and an interest in life-long learning

The development of literacy is a complex process that involves building on prior knowledge, culture and experiences in order to instill new knowledge and deepen understanding.

I especially like the last line. I hope my TC’s do to.

Click to access PayingAttentiontoLiteracy.pdf

Developing Visual Literacy Skills

August 5, 2016classroom teachers, curriculum; teachers, education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher educationcartoons, communiction, critical thinking, images, making meaning, visual literacyDr. Cathy Miyata

As I (Cathy) prepare to teach my primary literacy class in teacher education at Laurier University, I have been reviewing the need to address visual literacy. Visual literacy is interpreting and evaluating images, animations, words, and symbols while also integrating sensory experiences. As students from K to 12 are constantly bombarded with images, it is essential that we incorporate visual literacy into the curriculum to allow students to develop comprehension and critical thinking skills that are specific to visual literary.

Sankey (2002) states:

Visual images are fast becoming the most predominant form of communication. Visual genres and mediums now dominate communication; photographs, television. film, video, the internet, cartoons, posters, t-shirts, comics, multimedia presentations and computer simulations.

The following diagram effectively highlights why visual literacy should be incorporated into our primary curriculum:

Personally, I find cartoons a wonderful source of meaning making and came across the following diagram supporting Blooms and cartoons.

I also find cartoons useful in establishing a particular atmosphere in my university classroom and incorporate them weekly into my power points. I’ll use this one on our first day to introduce the topic of visual literacy and how 21st century classrooms may be somewhat different than what we experienced as children.

http://dovernewliteraciesproject.weebly.com/digital-vs-visual-literacy.html

‘Pokémon Go’ a Go in Education

July 29, 2016classroom teachers, education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher education, teacher educatorsautism and apps, being social through apps, cultural phenonenons, getting active with apps, new apps, Pokémon, Pokémon GoDr. Cathy Miyata

I (Cathy) was initially confused when I recently started hearing the name “Pokémon” come up time and again. I mean, isn’t that a bit outdated I thought? The Pokémon game was first made popular in the 1990s as a video game, and my children loved it. I soon discovered, however, the new Pokémon game, Pokémon Go, is an app that allows players to see and “catch” Pokémon characters in the real world through their phone screen and it has quickly developed into a cultural phenomenon. Personally, I haven’t tried it (yet) and find it rather amusing to watch grown people chase imaginary characters through the park or around buildings. But there have been educational insights into this new app that have intrigued me greatly. For example Australian autism expert Craig Smith has devised a way of incorporating the hit game into his lessons to encourage autistic students’ social skills. According to The Independent:

Pupils at a school in Australia are being actively encouraged to use Pokémon Go in the classroom, after research showed the game could help rather than hinder their studies. Craig Smith, an academic specialising in Autism research, found that by allowing his pupils to use the augmented reality game in and out of the classroom, their social skills had improved and the children appeared more engaged with their learning.

Dr. Smith, who is also the Deputy Principle at the Aspect Hunter School for Children with Autism in Newcastle, New South Wales, said the game was unique in that it encouraged children with and without learning difficulties to play outside and engage with other students.

Smith said, “We wholly embrace whatever it is that kids are interested in and use that as a window into their world and bridge into further educational opportunities for them. For many of the children I teach it’s hard to engage in social activities – even going down to the shops can be socially overwhelming. But what we’re seeing with the Pokémon craze is the same students are making conversation and engaging in social activities through the game.”

With this in mind I am willing to give Go a go. Should be fun and give some else a chance to be amused at my chasing imaginary characters. I would also like to incorporate it into the orientation program of my literacy class!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/pok-mon-go-classroom-help-autistic-children-australia-craig-smith-a7144946.html

To Wikipedia , or not to Wikipedia…

July 23, 2016classroom teachers, education, literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Teacher educationinfomation age, newspaper sources, validity, Wikipedia, Wikipedia humourDr. Cathy Miyata

Convincing students, even in higher education, of the validity of Wikipedia can be challenging, so I (Cathy) use a little humour to introduce the debate. I like this cartoon because it is an adult telling the child the information must be correct. But then, my grandparents believed everything they read in the newspaper. Everything. It was in print and therefore had to be true. They never considered the possibility that newspapers were political institutions with bias opinions. Never. Now our students have to consider the possibility the information on the internet may be a practical joke . I have personally spoken to people who find it amusing to change information on Wikipedia so that it is incorrect. Yet, I still use Wikipedia to access quick information. However, I do so with caution. The information age is interesting, but it can have its challenges. Discernment and constant checking is key.

Discovering New Pre-service Texts

July 15, 2016literacy, Literacy teacher educators, Social Justice, Teacher education, teacher educatorsdrama in the classroom, interdiciplinary lessons, literacy, pre-service teaching, teacher education, teaching activitiesDr. Cathy Miyata

I (Cathy) find myself skeptical of books or articles that use the term ‘activities’ in reference to assigning work to students in the classroom. I was once told the term activities infers no purpose or goal and can be viewed as ‘busy work’. Instead, I was instructed to use the term ‘task’ which infers a specific result must be achieved to accomplish the work. I was therefore skeptical of a book I recently encountered titled, Pump It Up: Literacy Activities for the Classroom. However, the caption on the book jacket read “specifically aims to help pre-service teachers learn to implement hands-on lessons for their content area.” So I decided to take a closer look. I quickly recognized the editors Joanne Kilgour Dowdy (Kent State University, Ohio USA) and Yang Gao (Kent State University, Ohio) required the contributing authors to include learning objectives for each learning ‘activity’ included in the volume. I also realized the editors use the term activity to refer to a series of tasks that comprise a lesson. For example, the activity depicted by contributing author Jessica Wilson explains, “This activity is devised to demonstrate how literacy and creativity can be achieved through all disciplines including science” and describes a free write lesson designed to encourage students to interpret key vocabulary words and develop appropriate syntax and discourse of key terms.

I was delighted to discover the activities or lessons in the book explore an array of disciplines and topics (e.g., health and physical education; drama and other arts; social justice; multiculturalism through children’s literature; literacy/language arts; and mathematics) and the disciplines appear to cross (e.g., using dram to explore science and journaling to explore mathematics). Further, I was intrigued by the sections earmarked Becoming an Artist and Embodying Social Justice.

Well, having now moved past my fear of the term ‘activities’, I have ordered a copy. I proved to myself I not only should not judge a book by its cover, I also should not judge a book by its title! As I will be teaching pre-service drama next semester and plan to include as many cross disciplinary ‘activities’ as I can , I am hoping this will be a nice addition to the book collection I will provide for my teacher candidates. Can’t wait for it to arrive!